Cookies help us display personalized product recommendations and ensure you have great shopping experience.

By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
SmartData CollectiveSmartData Collective
  • Analytics
    AnalyticsShow More
    chatgpt image jul 13, 2026, 04 23 45 pm
    How Data Analytics Helps Companies Improve User Engagement
    19 Min Read
    chatgpt image jul 13, 2026, 03 59 46 pm
    How Data Analytics Improves Multi-Location Search Strategies
    10 Min Read
    cybersecurity efforts
    How Behavioral Analytics and AI Are Redefining Cybersecurity for Boca Raton Businesses
    14 Min Read
    data driven risk management in heatlhcare
    How Data Analytics Is Changing Healthcare Risk Management
    17 Min Read
    big data and customer service outsourcing
    How Data Analytics Improves Customer Service Outsourcing
    18 Min Read
  • Big Data
  • BI
  • Exclusive
  • IT
  • Marketing
  • Software
Search
© 2008-25 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: How to compare two audio files quality wise?
Share
Notification
Font ResizerAa
SmartData CollectiveSmartData Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • About
  • Help
  • Privacy
Follow US
© 2008-23 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
SmartData Collective > Big Data > Data Mining > How to compare two audio files quality wise?
Data Mining

How to compare two audio files quality wise?

Editor SDC
Editor SDC
3 Min Read
SHARE

In order to compare two audio signals we introduce theanalytical module, which compares separately combined pairs of fragments ofactive and inactive phase signal that allows getting more accurate estimation.

For each fragment we determine integral spectrum by usingdiscrete cosine transformation (DCT). Spectrum integration is calculatedaccording to the proprietary formula. In the spectrum calculation the interpenetrationof windows comes to N/2 samples, and the Hamming or Blackmann-Harris windowfunction is applied to every window. Levels of spectrum energy on bands aredetermined for all sets of bands. Groups of critical bands, determined bydifferent authors resulting from different models of sound perception andspeech production.

Band boundaries (initial and terminal indices) as well asband energy values we determine by a set of proprietary formulas. The initialquality estimation value is taken as 100%, which decreases proportionally todistinction of energies on bands. The most interesting fact is that we canscale down our percentage of signals similarity to the well-known Mean OpinionScore (MOS) values, which correspond in tests to Cisco MOS or ITU P.862 asprecise as 97%. More intere…

More Read

Guy Kawasaki Adds a Market Research AllTop!
Google Paper on Parallel EM Algorithm using MapReduce
Data Visualization’s Final Frontier
EmSense, a “neuromarketing” company founded in 2004 by seven…
Ben Goertzel’s Report on AGI-09: The Second Conference on…

In order to compare two audio signals we introduce theanalytical module, which compares separately combined pairs of fragments ofactive and inactive phase signal that allows getting more accurate estimation.

For each fragment we determine integral spectrum by usingdiscrete cosine transformation (DCT). Spectrum integration is calculatedaccording to the proprietary formula. In the spectrum calculation the interpenetrationof windows comes to N/2 samples, and the Hamming or Blackmann-Harris windowfunction is applied to every window. Levels of spectrum energy on bands aredetermined for all sets of bands. Groups of critical bands, determined bydifferent authors resulting from different models of sound perception andspeech production.

Band boundaries (initial and terminal indices) as well asband energy values we determine by a set of proprietary formulas. The initialquality estimation value is taken as 100%, which decreases proportionally todistinction of energies on bands. The most interesting fact is that we canscale down our percentage of signals similarity to the well-known Mean OpinionScore (MOS) values, which correspond in tests to Cisco MOS or ITU P.862 asprecise as 97%. More interesting facts to follow – stay in touch!

Share This Article
Facebook Pinterest LinkedIn
Share

Follow us on Facebook

Latest News

chatgpt image jul 18, 2026, 05 09 14 pm
When Data-Driven Businesses Must Recover Data from USB Drives
Big Data Exclusive
chatgpt image jul 15, 2026, 03 28 38 pm
How Cloud Technology Helps IT Asset Recovery Services
Cloud Computing Exclusive IT Security
chatgpt image jul 13, 2026, 04 23 45 pm
How Data Analytics Helps Companies Improve User Engagement
Analytics Big Data Exclusive
chatgpt image jul 13, 2026, 04 19 58 pm
Can AI Help Companies Improve PPC Fulfilment?
Artificial Intelligence Exclusive

Stay Connected

1.2KFollowersLike
33.7KFollowersFollow
222FollowersPin

You Might also Like

#13: Here’s a thought…

6 Min Read

Tweeting from R

4 Min Read
Image
Big DataData Mining

Mashing, Mixing and Maximizing Data

4 Min Read

Climate Change Under the Text Analytics Microscope

4 Min Read

SmartData Collective is one of the largest & trusted community covering technical content about Big Data, BI, Cloud, Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, IoT & more.

giveaway chatbots
How To Get An Award Winning Giveaway Bot
Big Data Chatbots Exclusive
ai chatbot
The Art of Conversation: Enhancing Chatbots with Advanced AI Prompts
Chatbots

Quick Link

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Follow US
© 2008-26 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?