Cookies help us display personalized product recommendations and ensure you have great shopping experience.

By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
SmartData CollectiveSmartData Collective
  • Analytics
    AnalyticsShow More
    big data analytics in transporation
    Turning Data Into Decisions: How Analytics Improves Transportation Strategy
    3 Min Read
    sales and data analytics
    How Data Analytics Improves Lead Management and Sales Results
    9 Min Read
    data analytics and truck accident claims
    How Data Analytics Reduces Truck Accidents and Speeds Up Claims
    7 Min Read
    predictive analytics for interior designers
    Interior Designers Boost Profits with Predictive Analytics
    8 Min Read
    image fx (67)
    Improving LinkedIn Ad Strategies with Data Analytics
    9 Min Read
  • Big Data
  • BI
  • Exclusive
  • IT
  • Marketing
  • Software
Search
© 2008-25 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: How to compare two audio files quality wise?
Share
Notification
Font ResizerAa
SmartData CollectiveSmartData Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • About
  • Help
  • Privacy
Follow US
© 2008-23 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
SmartData Collective > Big Data > Data Mining > How to compare two audio files quality wise?
Data Mining

How to compare two audio files quality wise?

Editor SDC
Editor SDC
3 Min Read
SHARE

In order to compare two audio signals we introduce theanalytical module, which compares separately combined pairs of fragments ofactive and inactive phase signal that allows getting more accurate estimation.

For each fragment we determine integral spectrum by usingdiscrete cosine transformation (DCT). Spectrum integration is calculatedaccording to the proprietary formula. In the spectrum calculation the interpenetrationof windows comes to N/2 samples, and the Hamming or Blackmann-Harris windowfunction is applied to every window. Levels of spectrum energy on bands aredetermined for all sets of bands. Groups of critical bands, determined bydifferent authors resulting from different models of sound perception andspeech production.

Band boundaries (initial and terminal indices) as well asband energy values we determine by a set of proprietary formulas. The initialquality estimation value is taken as 100%, which decreases proportionally todistinction of energies on bands. The most interesting fact is that we canscale down our percentage of signals similarity to the well-known Mean OpinionScore (MOS) values, which correspond in tests to Cisco MOS or ITU P.862 asprecise as 97%. More intere…

More Read

Speech Intelligibility is not enough – let’s go for speech transmission index! The truth is out there…
Just as the media and businesses are coming to grips with Web…
An R Package only for SAS Users
The Secrets to Big Data and Information Optimization Revealed in 2013 Research Agenda
IBM Research has built a new nanoscale microscope capable of…

In order to compare two audio signals we introduce theanalytical module, which compares separately combined pairs of fragments ofactive and inactive phase signal that allows getting more accurate estimation.

For each fragment we determine integral spectrum by usingdiscrete cosine transformation (DCT). Spectrum integration is calculatedaccording to the proprietary formula. In the spectrum calculation the interpenetrationof windows comes to N/2 samples, and the Hamming or Blackmann-Harris windowfunction is applied to every window. Levels of spectrum energy on bands aredetermined for all sets of bands. Groups of critical bands, determined bydifferent authors resulting from different models of sound perception andspeech production.

Band boundaries (initial and terminal indices) as well asband energy values we determine by a set of proprietary formulas. The initialquality estimation value is taken as 100%, which decreases proportionally todistinction of energies on bands. The most interesting fact is that we canscale down our percentage of signals similarity to the well-known Mean OpinionScore (MOS) values, which correspond in tests to Cisco MOS or ITU P.862 asprecise as 97%. More interesting facts to follow – stay in touch!

Share This Article
Facebook Pinterest LinkedIn
Share

Follow us on Facebook

Latest News

ai for building crypto banks
Building Your Own Crypto Bank with AI
Blockchain Exclusive
julia taubitz vn5s g5spky unsplash
Benefits of AI in Nursing Education Amid Medicaid Cuts
Artificial Intelligence Exclusive News
AI role in medical industry
The Role Of AI In Transforming Medical Manufacturing
Artificial Intelligence Exclusive
b2b sales
Unseen Barriers: Identifying Bottlenecks In B2B Sales
Business Rules Exclusive Infographic

Stay Connected

1.2kFollowersLike
33.7kFollowersFollow
222FollowersPin

You Might also Like

Speeding Past Milestones

3 Min Read

Weny

1 Min Read

Can Ants Help Solve Traffic Jams?

0 Min Read

On the Government, Data, Cooperation, Crisis, and Opportunity

4 Min Read

SmartData Collective is one of the largest & trusted community covering technical content about Big Data, BI, Cloud, Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, IoT & more.

ai in ecommerce
Artificial Intelligence for eCommerce: A Closer Look
Artificial Intelligence
giveaway chatbots
How To Get An Award Winning Giveaway Bot
Big Data Chatbots Exclusive

Quick Link

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Follow US
© 2008-25 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Go to mobile version
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?