Cookies help us display personalized product recommendations and ensure you have great shopping experience.

By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
SmartData CollectiveSmartData Collective
  • Analytics
    AnalyticsShow More
    image fx (60)
    Data Analytics Driving the Modern E-commerce Warehouse
    13 Min Read
    big data analytics in transporation
    Turning Data Into Decisions: How Analytics Improves Transportation Strategy
    3 Min Read
    sales and data analytics
    How Data Analytics Improves Lead Management and Sales Results
    9 Min Read
    data analytics and truck accident claims
    How Data Analytics Reduces Truck Accidents and Speeds Up Claims
    7 Min Read
    predictive analytics for interior designers
    Interior Designers Boost Profits with Predictive Analytics
    8 Min Read
  • Big Data
  • BI
  • Exclusive
  • IT
  • Marketing
  • Software
Search
© 2008-25 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: How to compare two audio files quality wise?
Share
Notification
Font ResizerAa
SmartData CollectiveSmartData Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • About
  • Help
  • Privacy
Follow US
© 2008-23 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
SmartData Collective > Big Data > Data Mining > How to compare two audio files quality wise?
Data Mining

How to compare two audio files quality wise?

Editor SDC
Editor SDC
3 Min Read
SHARE

In order to compare two audio signals we introduce theanalytical module, which compares separately combined pairs of fragments ofactive and inactive phase signal that allows getting more accurate estimation.

For each fragment we determine integral spectrum by usingdiscrete cosine transformation (DCT). Spectrum integration is calculatedaccording to the proprietary formula. In the spectrum calculation the interpenetrationof windows comes to N/2 samples, and the Hamming or Blackmann-Harris windowfunction is applied to every window. Levels of spectrum energy on bands aredetermined for all sets of bands. Groups of critical bands, determined bydifferent authors resulting from different models of sound perception andspeech production.

Band boundaries (initial and terminal indices) as well asband energy values we determine by a set of proprietary formulas. The initialquality estimation value is taken as 100%, which decreases proportionally todistinction of energies on bands. The most interesting fact is that we canscale down our percentage of signals similarity to the well-known Mean OpinionScore (MOS) values, which correspond in tests to Cisco MOS or ITU P.862 asprecise as 97%. More intere…

More Read

Semantic analytics serves the truth & vegetables from a social media diet
Facts not fears, confidence not certainty, critical thinking not wishful thinking
“I think it is very likely that network infrastructure will be transformed in coming years by new…”
Who Gets the Call When Your Analytics Process Crashes?
Experience vs. Data: Consuming Mark Zuckerberg as Data

In order to compare two audio signals we introduce theanalytical module, which compares separately combined pairs of fragments ofactive and inactive phase signal that allows getting more accurate estimation.

For each fragment we determine integral spectrum by usingdiscrete cosine transformation (DCT). Spectrum integration is calculatedaccording to the proprietary formula. In the spectrum calculation the interpenetrationof windows comes to N/2 samples, and the Hamming or Blackmann-Harris windowfunction is applied to every window. Levels of spectrum energy on bands aredetermined for all sets of bands. Groups of critical bands, determined bydifferent authors resulting from different models of sound perception andspeech production.

Band boundaries (initial and terminal indices) as well asband energy values we determine by a set of proprietary formulas. The initialquality estimation value is taken as 100%, which decreases proportionally todistinction of energies on bands. The most interesting fact is that we canscale down our percentage of signals similarity to the well-known Mean OpinionScore (MOS) values, which correspond in tests to Cisco MOS or ITU P.862 asprecise as 97%. More interesting facts to follow – stay in touch!

Share This Article
Facebook Pinterest LinkedIn
Share

Follow us on Facebook

Latest News

Why the AI Race Is Being Decided at the Dataset Level
Why the AI Race Is Being Decided at the Dataset Level
Artificial Intelligence Big Data Exclusive
image fx (60)
Data Analytics Driving the Modern E-commerce Warehouse
Analytics Big Data Exclusive
ai for building crypto banks
Building Your Own Crypto Bank with AI
Blockchain Exclusive
julia taubitz vn5s g5spky unsplash
Benefits of AI in Nursing Education Amid Medicaid Cuts
Artificial Intelligence Exclusive News

Stay Connected

1.2kFollowersLike
33.7kFollowersFollow
222FollowersPin

You Might also Like

How To Develop A Top-Notch Data Warehousing System

5 Min Read
Image
AnalyticsBig DataBusiness IntelligenceData MiningDecision ManagementHadoopPredictive AnalyticsSentiment AnalyticsSocial Media AnalyticsText AnalyticsWorkforce AnalyticsWorkforce Data

Danger: 3 Reasons to Be Scared of Big Data

15 Min Read

Questions to Ask When Choosing a Social Media Monitoring Vendor

6 Min Read

First Look – SPSS Predictive Analytic Software 13

5 Min Read

SmartData Collective is one of the largest & trusted community covering technical content about Big Data, BI, Cloud, Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, IoT & more.

ai in ecommerce
Artificial Intelligence for eCommerce: A Closer Look
Artificial Intelligence
giveaway chatbots
How To Get An Award Winning Giveaway Bot
Big Data Chatbots Exclusive

Quick Link

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Follow US
© 2008-25 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Go to mobile version
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?