We use cookies, including third-party cookies from Google to serve personalized ads through AdSense, to operate this site and understand how it is used. By continuing to browse, you accept this use. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for details, including how to opt out of personalized advertising.
Accept
SmartData CollectiveSmartData Collective
  • Analytics
    AnalyticsShow More
    What Kind of Problem-Solving Distinguishes Data Analysts From Software Engineers -- AI-generated illustration
    What Kind of Problem-Solving Distinguishes Data Analysts From Software Engineers
    7 Min Read
    chatgpt image jul 21, 2026, 04 34 30 pm
    4 Core Benefits of Predictive Maintenance after Vibration Analysis
    10 Min Read
    How Does Data Mining Boost Customer Satisfaction in Logistics? Harnessing Analytics for Results -- AI-generated illustration
    How Does Data Mining Boost Customer Satisfaction in Logistics? Harnessing Analytics for Results
    11 Min Read
    chatgpt image jul 13, 2026, 04 23 45 pm
    How Data Analytics Helps Companies Improve User Engagement
    19 Min Read
    chatgpt image jul 13, 2026, 03 59 46 pm
    How Data Analytics Improves Multi-Location Search Strategies
    10 Min Read
  • Big Data
  • BI
  • Exclusive
  • IT
  • Marketing
  • Software
Search
© 2008-25 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Fewer BI Tools in Your Future
Share
Notification
Font ResizerAa
SmartData CollectiveSmartData Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • About
  • Help
  • Privacy
Follow US
© 2008-23 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
SmartData Collective > Business Intelligence > Fewer BI Tools in Your Future
Business Intelligence

Fewer BI Tools in Your Future

DougLautzenheiser
DougLautzenheiser
5 Min Read
Fewer BI Tools in Your Future
Photo by andreas160578 on Pixabay (https://pixabay.com/photos/diet-reduction-caviar-money-1336638/)
SHARE

According to a July 2009 survey conducted by InformationWeek Analytics and Intelligent Enterprise, organizations are continuing to reduce the number of BI tools and many are moving to a single standard.

When the survey was done in 2007, a third of the business technology professionals said that their company had standardized on one or a few BI tools deployed throughout the company. Two years later, the response to that question went up to almost half.

Here are some other findings:

  • Deploying BI tools on a project-by-project basic dropped from 22% to 19%
  • Having many BI tools scatttered through departments, operations, and locations dropped from 25% to 18%
  • Deploying BI tools as part of other technology initiatives dropped from 17% to 14%

Doug Henschen, editor in chief, says that while BI tool consolidation and standardization is not just marketing hype, no software vendor produces a single stack of technology that can meet all of the BI needs of an organization. That makes picking a single vendor’s product as a BI standard difficult.

More Read

CNC Machining Finds Innovative Ways To Leverage Artificial Intelligence
CNC Machining Finds Innovative Ways To Leverage Artificial Intelligence
Long Term Financial Planning with Financial Data Analytics
Analysts’ & Vendors’ Top 5 Pet Peeves About Each Other
Beyond RDBMS: Databases for Modern Applications
A Brazen Expose on Big Data in the Government Sector

Doug adds:

“Another key trend revealed in our survey is that businesses are forging new BI agendas. Yes, the longstanding challenges of accessing data and developing reports are still there, as is the push to share BI more broadly across the enterprise. But there’s growing interest behind analytics, embedded BI, and search-style querying.

  

New business requirements and new vendor capabilities make it unlikely an organization will settle on a single BI vendor. But consolidating around two or three vendors can help meet requirements and get the resource- and time-savings of standardization.”

Of course, identifying a BI tool or two as your standard is the easy step. Actually replacing all of the existing report writers in your organization is the hard part. When you look at the amount of work, several obstacles stand in your way of actually converting to the approved technology: 
  • There are thousands of legacy programs!
  • We don’t have the resources to convert these programs! 
  • There are hundreds of users impacted!
  • There are some power users who don’t want to change!
  • There are years of work effort involved!
  • We would have to spend millions of dollars!

It is easy to argue that moving to the new standard is an “undue burden” and therefore something you should not be forced to do. Yet smart companies are doing it because reducing the number of BI tools (especially legacy ones) can: 
  • Reduce license costs
  • Reduce internal support costs  
  • Reduce human resource challenge of scarce skillsets
  • Reduce the number of vendors with whom you must work
  • Improve productivity (e.g., no disputes about or research into BI tool selection)
  • Improve BI project success (consistent usage of the approved product)
  • Modernize to web-based and Microsoft Office-integrated technology

More companies will standardize their BI products and reduce the number of reporting tools they support — it is a natural progression (like spreadsheets, word processing, e-mail packages, and databases).

For a limited time, you can get a free copy of this BI report at InformationWeek.

TAGGED:bi toolsenterprise 2.0
Share This Article
Facebook Pinterest LinkedIn
Share

Follow us on Facebook

Latest News

Flat editorial illustration: The article's core relationship is workload-by-workload decision-making for cloud migration, where s
Which Workloads Should Move to the Cloud?
Cloud Computing Exclusive IT
Flat editorial illustration: The article positions data governance as a strategic board-level concern rather than a purely techni
Why Data Governance Is Becoming a Board-Level Business Priority
Big Data Exclusive Policy and Governance
Flat editorial illustration: The article argues that data annotation quality should be measured by inspectable gold sets, written
The Top Data Annotation Companies Are Separated by Proof of Quality, Not Headcount
Big Data Exclusive
Flat editorial illustration: The article's core relationship is the gap between raw bank-feed records and reliable subscription i
Subscription Trackers Have a Transaction Data Problem
Big Data Exclusive

Stay Connected

1.2KFollowersLike
33.7KFollowersFollow
222FollowersPin

You Might also Like

Why Context Matters - Forget Real-Time, Achieve Right-Time
AnalyticsBest PracticesBig DataBusiness IntelligenceBusiness RulesCulture/LeadershipData MiningSentiment AnalyticsSocial DataSocial Media AnalyticsText AnalyticsUnstructured DataWeb Analytics

Why Context Matters – Forget Real-Time, Achieve Right-Time

9 Min Read
Implementing Enterprise 2.0 at Intuit, Part Three: Cultural and Organizational Shifts
Uncategorized

Implementing Enterprise 2.0 at Intuit, Part Three: Cultural and Organizational Shifts

7 Min Read
Enterprise 2.0 Best Practices
CRM

Enterprise 2.0 Best Practices

6 Min Read
Redefining the enterprise user experience
CRM

Redefining the enterprise user experience

9 Min Read

SmartData Collective is one of the largest & trusted community covering technical content about Big Data, BI, Cloud, Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, IoT & more.

The Art of Conversation: Enhancing Chatbots with Advanced AI Prompts
The Art of Conversation: Enhancing Chatbots with Advanced AI Prompts
Chatbots
From Bolts to Bots: How AI Is Fortifying the Automotive Industry
From Bolts to Bots: How AI Is Fortifying the Automotive Industry
Artificial Intelligence

Quick Link

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Follow US
© 2008-26 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?