By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
SmartData Collective
  • Analytics
    AnalyticsShow More
    data science anayst
    Growing Demand for Data Science & Data Analyst Roles
    6 Min Read
    predictive analytics in dropshipping
    Predictive Analytics Helps New Dropshipping Businesses Thrive
    12 Min Read
    data-driven approach in healthcare
    The Importance of Data-Driven Approaches to Improving Healthcare in Rural Areas
    6 Min Read
    analytics for tax compliance
    Analytics Changes the Calculus of Business Tax Compliance
    8 Min Read
    big data analytics in gaming
    The Role of Big Data Analytics in Gaming
    10 Min Read
  • Big Data
  • BI
  • Exclusive
  • IT
  • Marketing
  • Software
Search
© 2008-23 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Scientists misusing Statistics
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
ai in automotive industry
AI Is Changing the Automotive Industry Forever
Artificial Intelligence
SMEs Use AI-Driven Financial Software for Greater Efficiency
Artificial Intelligence
data security in big data age
6 Reasons to Boost Data Security Plan in the Age of Big Data
Big Data
data science anayst
Growing Demand for Data Science & Data Analyst Roles
Data Science
ai software development
Key Strategies to Develop AI Software Cost-Effectively
Artificial Intelligence
Aa
SmartData Collective
Aa
Search
  • About
  • Help
  • Privacy
Follow US
© 2008-23 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
SmartData Collective > Uncategorized > Scientists misusing Statistics
Uncategorized

Scientists misusing Statistics

DavidMSmith
Last updated: 2010/03/30 at 6:03 PM
DavidMSmith
4 Min Read
SHARE

In ScienceNews this month, there’s controversial article exposing the fact that results claimed to be “statistically significant” in scientific articles aren’t always what they’re cracked up to be. The article — titled “Odds Are, It’s Wrong” is interesting, but I take a bit of an issue with the sub-headline, “Science fails to face the shortcomings of Statistics”. As it happens, the examples in the article are mostly cases of scientists behaving badly and abusing statistical techniques and results:

  • Authors abusing P-vales to conflate statistical significance with practical significance. A for example, a drug may uncritically be described as “significantly” reducing the risk of some outcome, but the the actual scale of the statistically significant difference is so small that is has no real clinical implication.
  • Not accounting for multiple comparisons biases. By definition, a test “significant at the 95% level” has 5% chance of having occurred by random chance alone. Do enough tests, and you’ll find some indeed indicate significant differences — but there will be some fluke events in that batch. There are so many studies, experiments and tests being done…

More Read

analyzing big data for its quality and value

Use this Strategic Approach to Maximize Your Data’s Value

7 Data Lineage Tool Tips For Preventing Human Error in Data Processing
Preserving Data Quality is Critical for Leveraging Analytics with Amazon PPC
Quality Control Tips for Data Collection with Drone Surveying
3 Huge Reasons that Data Integrity is Absolutely Essential

In ScienceNews this month, there’s controversial article exposing the fact that results claimed to be “statistically significant” in scientific articles aren’t always what they’re cracked up to be. The article — titled “Odds Are, It’s Wrong” is interesting, but I take a bit of an issue with the sub-headline, “Science fails to face the shortcomings of Statistics”. As it happens, the examples in the article are mostly cases of scientists behaving badly and abusing statistical techniques and results:

  • Authors abusing P-vales to conflate statistical significance with practical significance. A for example, a drug may uncritically be described as “significantly” reducing the risk of some outcome, but the the actual scale of the statistically significant difference is so small that is has no real clinical implication.
  • Not accounting for multiple comparisons biases. By definition, a test “significant at the 95% level” has 5% chance of having occurred by random chance alone. Do enough tests, and you’ll find some indeed indicate significant differences — but there will be some fluke events in that batch. There are so many studies, experiments and tests being done today  (oftentimes, all in the same paper)that the “false discovery rate” maybe higher than we think — especially given that most nonsignificant results go unreported.

Statisticians, in general, are aware of these problems and have offered solutions: there’s a vast field of literature on multiple comparisons tests, reporting bias, and alternatives (such as Bayesian methods) to P-value tests. But more often than not, these “arcane” issues (which are actually part of any statistical training) go ignored in scientific journals. You don’t need to be a cynic to understand the motives of the authors for doing so — hey, a publication is a publication, right? — but the cooperation of the peer reviewers and editorial boards is disturbing.

ScienceNews: Odds Are, It’s Wrong

Link to original post

TAGGED: data quality
DavidMSmith March 30, 2010
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn
Share

Follow us on Facebook

Latest News

ai in automotive industry
AI Is Changing the Automotive Industry Forever
Artificial Intelligence
SMEs Use AI-Driven Financial Software for Greater Efficiency
Artificial Intelligence
data security in big data age
6 Reasons to Boost Data Security Plan in the Age of Big Data
Big Data
data science anayst
Growing Demand for Data Science & Data Analyst Roles
Data Science

Stay Connected

1.2k Followers Like
33.7k Followers Follow
222 Followers Pin

You Might also Like

analyzing big data for its quality and value
Big Data

Use this Strategic Approach to Maximize Your Data’s Value

6 Min Read
data lineage tool
Big Data

7 Data Lineage Tool Tips For Preventing Human Error in Data Processing

6 Min Read
data quality and role of analytics
Data Quality

Preserving Data Quality is Critical for Leveraging Analytics with Amazon PPC

8 Min Read
data collection with drone use
Data Collection

Quality Control Tips for Data Collection with Drone Surveying

9 Min Read

SmartData Collective is one of the largest & trusted community covering technical content about Big Data, BI, Cloud, Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, IoT & more.

giveaway chatbots
How To Get An Award Winning Giveaway Bot
Big Data Chatbots Exclusive
ai is improving the safety of cars
From Bolts to Bots: How AI Is Fortifying the Automotive Industry
Artificial Intelligence

Quick Link

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Follow US

© 2008-23 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.

Removed from reading list

Undo
Go to mobile version
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?