Cookies help us display personalized product recommendations and ensure you have great shopping experience.

By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
SmartData CollectiveSmartData Collective
  • Analytics
    AnalyticsShow More
    predictive analytics risk management
    How Predictive Analytics Is Redefining Risk Management Across Industries
    7 Min Read
    data analytics and gold trading
    Data Analytics and the New Era of Gold Trading
    9 Min Read
    composable analytics
    How Composable Analytics Unlocks Modular Agility for Data Teams
    9 Min Read
    data mining to find the right poly bag makers
    Using Data Analytics to Choose the Best Poly Mailer Bags
    12 Min Read
    data analytics for pharmacy trends
    How Data Analytics Is Tracking Trends in the Pharmacy Industry
    5 Min Read
  • Big Data
  • BI
  • Exclusive
  • IT
  • Marketing
  • Software
Search
© 2008-25 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Google’s Marissa Mayer on Privacy vs. Transparency
Share
Notification
Font ResizerAa
SmartData CollectiveSmartData Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • About
  • Help
  • Privacy
Follow US
© 2008-23 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
SmartData Collective > Uncategorized > Google’s Marissa Mayer on Privacy vs. Transparency
Uncategorized

Google’s Marissa Mayer on Privacy vs. Transparency

Daniel Tunkelang
Daniel Tunkelang
4 Min Read
SHARE

TechCrunch posted a transcript of a Charlie  Rose interviewing Google Vice President of Search Product and User Experience Marissa Mayer.

Here’s an excerpt I found particularly interesting:

Charlie Rose:
This is a broader philosophical question I want to talk about later. But I mean is there some point in which we know too much about people?

Marissa Mayer:
Well I think that in all cases it’s a tradeoff, right, where you will give you some of your privacy in order to gain some functionality, and so we really need to make those tradeoffs really clear to people, what information are we using and what’s the benefit to them? And then ultimately leave it to user choice so the user can decide. And you have to be very transparent about what information you have about that user and how it’s being used.

Charlie Rose:
But it’s also seems to me clearly a product of age and generation, how willing you are to give up privacy and to allow transparency, clearly.

Marissa Mayer:
Sure, absolutely…

That’s a great attitude. I only which Charlie Rose had fact-checked Google’s actual policy when it comes to transparency. Indeed, Google’s lack of transparency with advertiser…

More Read

Missing! Results from the field of change management
An Inconvenient Truth: Crowd-Sourced Approaches to Statistical Analysis in Science – and what this means for you
Hybrid Cloud: You Don’t Have to Go All In
The Number One Reason To Move To Open Source: Security
The iPad and the CD-Rom

TechCrunch posted a transcript of a Charlie  Rose interviewing Google Vice President of Search Product and User Experience Marissa Mayer.

Here’s an excerpt I found particularly interesting:

Charlie Rose:
This is a broader philosophical question I want to talk about later. But I mean is there some point in which we know too much about people?

Marissa Mayer:
Well I think that in all cases it’s a tradeoff, right, where you will give you some of your privacy in order to gain some functionality, and so we really need to make those tradeoffs really clear to people, what information are we using and what’s the benefit to them? And then ultimately leave it to user choice so the user can decide. And you have to be very transparent about what information you have about that user and how it’s being used.

Charlie Rose:
But it’s also seems to me clearly a product of age and generation, how willing you are to give up privacy and to allow transparency, clearly.

Marissa Mayer:
Sure, absolutely…

That’s a great attitude. I only which Charlie Rose had fact-checked Google’s actual policy when it comes to transparency. Indeed, Google’s lack of transparency with advertisers, who are its bread and butter, recently cost them $761 and a bunch of bad press. While I’m sure Google can afford the judgment (less than 2.5 shares of GOOG stock at the time of this writing), I hope they see this experience as an opportunity to review their principles.

And, of course, don’t get me started on the lack of transparency in their approach to relevance! For those who haven’t been regular readers, here are two of my recent posts about Google:

  • What Would Google Do? / What Does Google Do?
  • Is Google Evil? The Great Debate

Link to original post

Share This Article
Facebook Pinterest LinkedIn
Share

Follow us on Facebook

Latest News

street address database
Why Data-Driven Companies Rely on Accurate Street Address Databases
Big Data Exclusive
predictive analytics risk management
How Predictive Analytics Is Redefining Risk Management Across Industries
Analytics Exclusive Predictive Analytics
data analytics and gold trading
Data Analytics and the New Era of Gold Trading
Analytics Big Data Exclusive
student learning AI
Advanced Degrees Still Matter in an AI-Driven Job Market
Artificial Intelligence Exclusive

Stay Connected

1.2kFollowersLike
33.7kFollowersFollow
222FollowersPin

You Might also Like

Forrester’s EDM Wave

4 Min Read

3 Easy Checks to Ensure Quality Analytics Reporting

5 Min Read

Extend SOA governance to all of IT? Why not?

1 Min Read

10 Market Research Challenges

3 Min Read

SmartData Collective is one of the largest & trusted community covering technical content about Big Data, BI, Cloud, Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, IoT & more.

ai in ecommerce
Artificial Intelligence for eCommerce: A Closer Look
Artificial Intelligence
data-driven web design
5 Great Tips for Using Data Analytics for Website UX
Big Data

Quick Link

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Follow US
© 2008-25 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Go to mobile version
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?