Cookies help us display personalized product recommendations and ensure you have great shopping experience.

By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
SmartData CollectiveSmartData Collective
  • Analytics
    AnalyticsShow More
    media monitoring
    Signals In The Noise: Using Media Monitoring To Manage Negative Publicity
    5 Min Read
    data analytics
    How Data Analytics Can Help You Construct A Financial Weather Map
    4 Min Read
    financial analytics
    Financial Analytics Shows The Hidden Cost Of Not Switching Systems
    4 Min Read
    warehouse accidents
    Data Analytics and the Future of Warehouse Safety
    10 Min Read
    stock investing and data analytics
    How Data Analytics Supports Smarter Stock Trading Strategies
    4 Min Read
  • Big Data
  • BI
  • Exclusive
  • IT
  • Marketing
  • Software
Search
© 2008-25 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Because it’s Friday: The dating equation
Share
Notification
Font ResizerAa
SmartData CollectiveSmartData Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • About
  • Help
  • Privacy
Follow US
© 2008-23 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
SmartData Collective > Big Data > Data Visualization > Because it’s Friday: The dating equation
Data Visualization

Because it’s Friday: The dating equation

DavidMSmith
DavidMSmith
4 Min Read
SHARE

According to internet lore, there’s a mathematical equation that governs the lower bound for the socially acceptable age of a potential dating partner: half your age plus 7, or, in mathematical terms, if x is your age then the lower bound is f(x) = x/2 + 7.

Seems simple, right? if you’re 20, then the minimum socially acceptable age for a date is 17. But it was The Ragbag who pointed out that this rule has a duality: for the date to be socially acceptable, the rule must be adhered to by your date as well. In other words, there’s a socially acceptable maximum too, given by inverting the equation:

It was only yesterday that i realised that the rule of thumb for dating people of different ages (the “half your age plus 7” rule) determines not only the lower bounds for dating but the upper bounds as well—that for each ½x + 7, there is a corresponding 2(x-7). For the last 15 years of my life, i have been ignoring an entire market segment, namely those of the genus cougar.

The Ragbag handily plotted out the socially acceptable upper and lower bounds for dates at various ages in the chart below:

Halfageplus7rule

More Read

Growth in Data-Related Jobs, cnt’d
Charlie Sheen and the Visualization Machine
PAW: High-Performance Scoring of Healthcare Data
Overcoming Data Management Challenges in Online Channel
Big Data Q&A for the Data Protection Law and Policy Newsletter

Notably, the chart also implies that there is a socially acceptable lower …

According to internet lore, there’s a mathematical equation that governs the lower bound for the socially acceptable age of a potential dating partner: half your age plus 7, or, in mathematical terms, if x is your age then the lower bound is f(x) = x/2 + 7.

Seems simple, right? if you’re 20, then the minimum socially acceptable age for a date is 17. But it was The Ragbag who pointed out that this rule has a duality: for the date to be socially acceptable, the rule must be adhered to by your date as well. In other words, there’s a socially acceptable maximum too, given by inverting the equation:

It was only yesterday that i realised that the rule of thumb for dating people of different ages (the “half your age plus 7” rule) determines not only the lower bounds for dating but the upper bounds as well—that for each ½x + 7, there is a corresponding 2(x-7). For the last 15 years of my life, i have been ignoring an entire market segment, namely those of the genus cougar.

The Ragbag handily plotted out the socially acceptable upper and lower bounds for dates at various ages in the chart below:

Halfageplus7rule

Notably, the chart also implies that there is a socially acceptable lower bound for your own age: below the age of 14, by this rule, you shouldn’t be dating at all.

Incidentally, if you’re wondering how well is this rule adhered to in practice, the dating website okcupid.com has done an extensive analysis of age preferences amongst their members. A really interesting analysis (and quite sophisticated – maybe done in R?), especially for heterosexual males looking for the ideal age-ranges for potential dates. 

The Ragbag: The half your age plus 7 rule

Link to original post

TAGGED:data visualizationr
Share This Article
Facebook Pinterest LinkedIn
Share

Follow us on Facebook

Latest News

cloud dataops for metering
Taming the IoT Firehose: How Utilities Are Scaling Cloud DataOps for Smart Metering
Cloud Computing Exclusive Internet of Things IT
ai in video game development
Machine Learning Is Changing iGaming Software Development
Exclusive Machine Learning News
media monitoring
Signals In The Noise: Using Media Monitoring To Manage Negative Publicity
Analytics Exclusive Infographic
data=driven approach
Turning Dead Zones Into Data-Driven Opportunities In Retail Spaces
Big Data Exclusive Infographic

Stay Connected

1.2KFollowersLike
33.7KFollowersFollow
222FollowersPin

You Might also Like

Do We Really Need More Data?

3 Min Read
data visualization trends 2022
Data Visualization

Biggest Trends in Data Visualization Taking Shape in 2022

8 Min Read

Chrome Experiments: Online Data Visualization

2 Min Read

A year on: The promise of SAP HANA for Big Data analytics (Part Two)

0 Min Read

SmartData Collective is one of the largest & trusted community covering technical content about Big Data, BI, Cloud, Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, IoT & more.

AI chatbots
AI Chatbots Can Help Retailers Convert Live Broadcast Viewers into Sales!
Chatbots
ai in ecommerce
Artificial Intelligence for eCommerce: A Closer Look
Artificial Intelligence

Quick Link

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Follow US
© 2008-25 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?