Cookies help us display personalized product recommendations and ensure you have great shopping experience.

By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
SmartData CollectiveSmartData Collective
  • Analytics
    AnalyticsShow More
    warehouse accidents
    Data Analytics and the Future of Warehouse Safety
    10 Min Read
    stock investing and data analytics
    How Data Analytics Supports Smarter Stock Trading Strategies
    4 Min Read
    predictive analytics risk management
    How Predictive Analytics Is Redefining Risk Management Across Industries
    7 Min Read
    data analytics and gold trading
    Data Analytics and the New Era of Gold Trading
    9 Min Read
    composable analytics
    How Composable Analytics Unlocks Modular Agility for Data Teams
    9 Min Read
  • Big Data
  • BI
  • Exclusive
  • IT
  • Marketing
  • Software
Search
© 2008-25 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Because it’s Friday: The dating equation
Share
Notification
Font ResizerAa
SmartData CollectiveSmartData Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • About
  • Help
  • Privacy
Follow US
© 2008-23 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
SmartData Collective > Big Data > Data Visualization > Because it’s Friday: The dating equation
Data Visualization

Because it’s Friday: The dating equation

DavidMSmith
DavidMSmith
4 Min Read
SHARE

According to internet lore, there’s a mathematical equation that governs the lower bound for the socially acceptable age of a potential dating partner: half your age plus 7, or, in mathematical terms, if x is your age then the lower bound is f(x) = x/2 + 7.

Seems simple, right? if you’re 20, then the minimum socially acceptable age for a date is 17. But it was The Ragbag who pointed out that this rule has a duality: for the date to be socially acceptable, the rule must be adhered to by your date as well. In other words, there’s a socially acceptable maximum too, given by inverting the equation:

It was only yesterday that i realised that the rule of thumb for dating people of different ages (the “half your age plus 7” rule) determines not only the lower bounds for dating but the upper bounds as well—that for each ½x + 7, there is a corresponding 2(x-7). For the last 15 years of my life, i have been ignoring an entire market segment, namely those of the genus cougar.

The Ragbag handily plotted out the socially acceptable upper and lower bounds for dates at various ages in the chart below:

Halfageplus7rule

More Read

NSA and the Future of Big Data
Scale, Structure and Semantics
A year on: The promise of SAP HANA for Big Data analytics (Part Two)
5 Predictions for Trends in Data, Analytics and Machine Learning in 2016
How Big Data Becomes Smart Data

Notably, the chart also implies that there is a socially acceptable lower …

According to internet lore, there’s a mathematical equation that governs the lower bound for the socially acceptable age of a potential dating partner: half your age plus 7, or, in mathematical terms, if x is your age then the lower bound is f(x) = x/2 + 7.

Seems simple, right? if you’re 20, then the minimum socially acceptable age for a date is 17. But it was The Ragbag who pointed out that this rule has a duality: for the date to be socially acceptable, the rule must be adhered to by your date as well. In other words, there’s a socially acceptable maximum too, given by inverting the equation:

It was only yesterday that i realised that the rule of thumb for dating people of different ages (the “half your age plus 7” rule) determines not only the lower bounds for dating but the upper bounds as well—that for each ½x + 7, there is a corresponding 2(x-7). For the last 15 years of my life, i have been ignoring an entire market segment, namely those of the genus cougar.

The Ragbag handily plotted out the socially acceptable upper and lower bounds for dates at various ages in the chart below:

Halfageplus7rule

Notably, the chart also implies that there is a socially acceptable lower bound for your own age: below the age of 14, by this rule, you shouldn’t be dating at all.

Incidentally, if you’re wondering how well is this rule adhered to in practice, the dating website okcupid.com has done an extensive analysis of age preferences amongst their members. A really interesting analysis (and quite sophisticated – maybe done in R?), especially for heterosexual males looking for the ideal age-ranges for potential dates. 

The Ragbag: The half your age plus 7 rule

Link to original post

TAGGED:data visualizationr
Share This Article
Facebook Pinterest LinkedIn
Share

Follow us on Facebook

Latest News

Diverse Research Datasets
The 5 Best Platforms Offering the Most Diverse Research Datasets in 2026
Big Data Exclusive
macro intelligence and ai
How Permutable AI is Advancing Macro Intelligence for Complex Global Markets
Artificial Intelligence Exclusive
warehouse accidents
Data Analytics and the Future of Warehouse Safety
Analytics Commentary Exclusive
stock investing and data analytics
How Data Analytics Supports Smarter Stock Trading Strategies
Analytics Exclusive

Stay Connected

1.2KFollowersLike
33.7KFollowersFollow
222FollowersPin

You Might also Like

Guest Post: Inference for R

5 Min Read

Visualizing Katrina’s Strongest Winds with R

1 Min Read

Comparing baseball pitcher styles with lattice graphics

5 Min Read

Big Data: What can an energy company teach us about data science?

7 Min Read

SmartData Collective is one of the largest & trusted community covering technical content about Big Data, BI, Cloud, Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, IoT & more.

AI chatbots
AI Chatbots Can Help Retailers Convert Live Broadcast Viewers into Sales!
Chatbots
ai chatbot
The Art of Conversation: Enhancing Chatbots with Advanced AI Prompts
Chatbots

Quick Link

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Follow US
© 2008-25 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Go to mobile version
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?