Apples and Oranges
536 Views
There’s a fascinating — and heated — discussion going on over at Flowing Data about visualizations, and the quality thereof. It all started when Andrew Gelman commented on Flowing Data’s selection of the 5 best data visualizations of 2008, saying: “They all suck (for the purpose of data display).” Unsurprisingly, this kicked off a bit of a firestorm.
Nathan Yau’s response is well worth reading, particularly for the comments that follow. He suggests that statisticians are stuck in the mindset of Tukey and Tufte, and don’t “get” the “cool new stuff”. Point made, although statisticians are hardly a homogeneous bunch. I for one think many of the visualizations shown on Flowing Data and elsewhere are truly valuable, and have linked to some in the past. (I did however notice I’d omitted Flowing Data, a site well worth your time, from the blogroll — an omission since corrected.) Andrew did post a response in the comments with some justifications of his criticisms.
It occurs to me that this fooferaw is caused in some part by language. Charts / visualizations / graphics have different purposes in different venues: sometimes to present data, sometimes to explore and make discover…
There’s a fascinating — and heated — discussion going on over at Flowing Data about visualizations, and the quality thereof. It all started when Andrew Gelman commented on Flowing Data’s selection of the 5 best data visualizations of 2008, saying: “They all suck (for the purpose of data display).” Unsurprisingly, this kicked off a bit of a firestorm.
Nathan Yau’s response is well worth reading, particularly for the comments that follow. He suggests that statisticians are stuck in the mindset of Tukey and Tufte, and don’t “get” the “cool new stuff”. Point made, although statisticians are hardly a homogeneous bunch. I for one think many of the visualizations shown on Flowing Data and elsewhere are truly valuable, and have linked to some in the past. (I did however notice I’d omitted Flowing Data, a site well worth your time, from the blogroll — an omission since corrected.) Andrew did post a response in the comments with some justifications of his criticisms.
It occurs to me that this fooferaw is caused in some part by language. Charts / visualizations / graphics have different purposes in different venues: sometimes to present data, sometimes to explore and make discoveries, sometimes to offer an analysis or conclusion, sometimes to communicate a story. And sometimes they are by design not science but art, or intended “merely” to entertain. Yet we have no simple way to categorize these uses: as I just demonstrated, the words “chart”, “graphic”, “visualization” and others are all used interchangeably.
We don’t usually compare a comic book to a novel, or Rembrandt to a Clear Channel billboard. On the other hand, some novels are trash, and some comic books are sublime. When a creative work fails at its intended purpose, it’s worth calling it out and identifying the problems. But a heated argument on whether Battlestar Galactica is better or worse than Citizen Kane is only going to have the heat, but little light.
Trending Now
1
Analytics
44 shares2,694 views
44 shares2,694 views
How Virtual Assistants Use Data Analytics To Save Clients Money
Diana Hope - January 12, 20192
Artificial Intelligence
77 shares2,876 views
77 shares2,876 views
Here’s Why 2019 Will Bring Debates About Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
Andrej Kovacevic - January 12, 20193
Artificial Intelligence
93 shares3,454 views
93 shares3,454 views
Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Could Make Your Doctors Obsolete
Ryan Kade - January 12, 20194
Big Data
63 shares2,772 views
63 shares2,772 views
6 Ways Big Data Can Improve eCommerce For Your Business
Sean Mallon - January 11, 20195
Big Data
1,806 views
1,806 views
Is Your Data At Risk? Here’s How To Protect Your Information Online
Rehan Ijaz - January 11, 20196
Big Data
51 shares2,523 views
51 shares2,523 views
5 Genius App Data Monetization Strategies That Can Make You Bank
Annie Qureshi - January 10, 20197
Big Data
21 shares1,923 views
21 shares1,923 views
You must log in to post a comment.