Cookies help us display personalized product recommendations and ensure you have great shopping experience.

By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
SmartData CollectiveSmartData Collective
  • Analytics
    AnalyticsShow More
    data analytics and truck accident claims
    How Data Analytics Reduces Truck Accidents and Speeds Up Claims
    7 Min Read
    predictive analytics for interior designers
    Interior Designers Boost Profits with Predictive Analytics
    8 Min Read
    image fx (67)
    Improving LinkedIn Ad Strategies with Data Analytics
    9 Min Read
    big data and remote work
    Data Helps Speech-Language Pathologists Deliver Better Results
    6 Min Read
    data driven insights
    How Data-Driven Insights Are Addressing Gaps in Patient Communication and Equity
    8 Min Read
  • Big Data
  • BI
  • Exclusive
  • IT
  • Marketing
  • Software
Search
© 2008-25 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Developer Central Update: The CDB
Share
Notification
Font ResizerAa
SmartData CollectiveSmartData Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • About
  • Help
  • Privacy
Follow US
© 2008-23 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
SmartData Collective > Big Data > Data Warehousing > Developer Central Update: The CDB
Data Warehousing

Developer Central Update: The CDB

Editor SDC
Editor SDC
4 Min Read
SHARE

I have posted new versions of the SPSSINC MODIFY TABLES and SPSSINC MODIFY OUTPUT extension command dialog boxes to Developer Central.  Functionality is unchanged, but the dialogs have been redesigned. The dialog boxes for extension commands (among other things) are created with the Custom Dialog Builder (CDB).  The CDB, which is quite popular, was designed to…

I have posted new versions of the SPSSINC MODIFY TABLES and SPSSINC MODIFY OUTPUT extension command dialog boxes to Developer Central.  Functionality is unchanged, but the dialogs have been redesigned.

The dialog boxes for extension commands (among other things) are created with the Custom Dialog Builder (CDB).  The CDB, which is quite popular, was designed to make it really simple to create an SPSS Statistics-style dialog box.  An important part of that is the automatic layout of the controls.  To achieve this, controls are placed in two columns with an optional third column that holds only buttons.  Sizing is then automatic based on the size of the controls and accompanying text. (A tip: you can insert \n in text to force a line wrap in order to prevent a control from being too wide.)

More Read

BI and Marketing Lessons Learned from the F-22 Raptor
Datacenters Are Changing The Business Landscape
Some thoughts on advanced analytics in 2010
Why don’t they [IT] ever learn?
Challenges of Working with Big Data: Beyond the 3Vs

Both the SPSSINC MODIFY TABLES and SPSSINC MODIFY OUTPUT dialogs have a lot of options and, hence, a lot of controls, so fitting these into the CDB layout model resulted in pretty large dialogs.  I could have pushed some controls to a subdialog, but one of our design guidelines is to make it possible to complete a valid specification without visiting a subdialog, and I couldn’t see a reasonable way to do that with these commands.

Although large, these dialogs worked well until Windows 7 came along.  It aggressively scrunches dialogs that are a little too big for the screen area generating a surprising amount of misbehavior.

I wasn’t really happy with these dialogs anyway, so I decided to violate the guideline and require a visit to a subdialog in order to complete a command specification.  Now the selection portions of the commands are on the main dialog and the actions to take are on the sub.  This not only results in smaller and more pleasing dialogs, thus solving the Windows 7 problem, it also allowed me to expand some of the controls to achieve better validation.

Some of the controls in the original design are not applicable unless you specify a particular choice in another control.  For example, in Modify Output, you can filter the selected objects based on the outline title.  But if you left text in the filter field without picking the filter choice, you would get a syntax error.

The proper way to handle control dependencies such as this is to use a checkbox group or a similar structure to disable the irrelevant controls, since when syntax is generated, the CDB 0mits disabled controls, but in the original design there was not room to do this.  The new design expresses these dependencies better and makes it clearer what to do.

Try out these new dialogs, and let me know what you think.

TAGGED:spss
Share This Article
Facebook Pinterest LinkedIn
Share

Follow us on Facebook

Latest News

data analytics and truck accident claims
How Data Analytics Reduces Truck Accidents and Speeds Up Claims
Analytics Big Data Exclusive
predictive analytics for interior designers
Interior Designers Boost Profits with Predictive Analytics
Analytics Exclusive Predictive Analytics
big data and cybercrime
Stopping Lateral Movement in a Data-Heavy, Edge-First World
Big Data Exclusive
AI and data mining
What the Rise of AI Web Scrapers Means for Data Teams
Artificial Intelligence Big Data Exclusive

Stay Connected

1.2kFollowersLike
33.7kFollowersFollow
222FollowersPin

You Might also Like

The Output Translator

6 Min Read

Consuming Output for Further Processing

9 Min Read

NYT: SAS facing stiff competition

4 Min Read

IBM to acquire SPSS

2 Min Read

SmartData Collective is one of the largest & trusted community covering technical content about Big Data, BI, Cloud, Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, IoT & more.

ai in ecommerce
Artificial Intelligence for eCommerce: A Closer Look
Artificial Intelligence
data-driven web design
5 Great Tips for Using Data Analytics for Website UX
Big Data

Quick Link

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Follow US
© 2008-25 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Go to mobile version
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?