Cookies help us display personalized product recommendations and ensure you have great shopping experience.

By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
SmartData CollectiveSmartData Collective
  • Analytics
    AnalyticsShow More
    media monitoring
    Signals In The Noise: Using Media Monitoring To Manage Negative Publicity
    5 Min Read
    data analytics
    How Data Analytics Can Help You Construct A Financial Weather Map
    4 Min Read
    financial analytics
    Financial Analytics Shows The Hidden Cost Of Not Switching Systems
    4 Min Read
    warehouse accidents
    Data Analytics and the Future of Warehouse Safety
    10 Min Read
    stock investing and data analytics
    How Data Analytics Supports Smarter Stock Trading Strategies
    4 Min Read
  • Big Data
  • BI
  • Exclusive
  • IT
  • Marketing
  • Software
Search
© 2008-25 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Understanding Influence; the Chris Brogan Effect
Share
Notification
Font ResizerAa
SmartData CollectiveSmartData Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • About
  • Help
  • Privacy
Follow US
© 2008-23 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
SmartData Collective > Uncategorized > Understanding Influence; the Chris Brogan Effect
Uncategorized

Understanding Influence; the Chris Brogan Effect

JacobMorgan
JacobMorgan
6 Min Read
SHARE

Drop of water

Influence has been quite a hot topic in the social media, and as someone who has a degree in psychology (and business), I too find this topic quite interesting. I’m not saying I’m an influence expert, but I still enjoy the discussions and debates around the space. We focus a lot on individual influencer; in fact, we focus on them too much. Companies are always trying to find the “influencers” in their community, the folks with the greatest reach and the strongest pull. The truth is that we also need to be focusing on influencers as a group of people and not just as individuals.

I should warn everyone that I’ve been reading a book called “Connected” recently by Nicholas A. Christakis and James H. Fowler that is all about the power of our social networks and how they influence our lives (that is where the idea for this post came from). Let’s take Chris Brogan as an example. A lot of people consider him to be an influencer and a lot of folks reach out to him to help him promote a product or service. Why? Before you answer that let me introduce you to Stanley Milgram; a famous psychologist. Stanley ran a few experiments and found that if one person looks up at something that he …



Drop of water

More Read

Dunbar Lives!
List Growth: Five Must Dos
Componentizing Software
Canonical URLs and Faceted Search
Why Bad Data Is Wasting Your Marketing Efforts

Influence has been quite a hot topic in the social media, and as someone who has a degree in psychology (and business), I too find this topic quite interesting. I’m not saying I’m an influence expert, but I still enjoy the discussions and debates around the space. We focus a lot on individual influencer; in fact, we focus on them too much. Companies are always trying to find the “influencers” in their community, the folks with the greatest reach and the strongest pull. The truth is that we also need to be focusing on influencers as a group of people and not just as individuals.

I should warn everyone that I’ve been reading a book called “Connected” recently by Nicholas A. Christakis and James H. Fowler that is all about the power of our social networks and how they influence our lives (that is where the idea for this post came from). Let’s take Chris Brogan as an example. A lot of people consider him to be an influencer and a lot of folks reach out to him to help him promote a product or service. Why? Before you answer that let me introduce you to Stanley Milgram; a famous psychologist. Stanley ran a few experiments and found that if one person looks up at something that he can he can then influence 42% of passersby to look up as well. Stanley also found that if 15 people look up at something that 86% of the passersby are influences to look up (more than double the amount).

What does this mean? It means that individuals alone are not as influential as you might think, groups are far more influential. Keep in mind we’re not talking about influence on a one-to-one basis here. So what happens in the case of Chris Brogan (or any other “influencer”)? They create content, groups of people then see that content and start to share it around. On Twitter, for example, I rarely click on a link that Chris shares, however I follow a few people that follow Chris, and when the people I follow all start to share Chris’s content then I get interested and click on it (I usually click on it only after I see several people share it). So I’m not influenced to act by Chris as much as I’m influenced to act by the group of people that are all “looking up.” I would argue the same for a lot of other “influencers” such as Scoble, Guy Kawasaki, “insert name here.”

Chris is able to influence his core community, which probably consists of a handful of people. However, those people are connected to hundreds of thousands of other people on the web with only a few degrees of separation. When those people start to share and propagate content that Chris creates, then their connections start to see that content eventually as well. It’s almost like throwing a rock in a pond: those closest to the center are the most affected by the the ripples; depending on how big the rock is, the ripples can either fade quickly or expand to cover a large area. Chris is the guy throwing in the rock.

There are a lot of theories and explanations for influence; I don’t consider there to be a right or a wrong answer; just something to think about. When large brands are looking to reach out to folks such as Chris Brogan, what they are really saying is “throw this rock in the pond for us.” We also need to remember that reach does not equal influence.

Curious to hear all of your thoughts on influence. It’s an interesting topic!


Link to original post

TAGGED:chris broganinfluencerssocial mediatwitter
Share This Article
Facebook Pinterest LinkedIn
Share

Follow us on Facebook

Latest News

cloud dataops for metering
Taming the IoT Firehose: How Utilities Are Scaling Cloud DataOps for Smart Metering
Cloud Computing Exclusive Internet of Things IT
ai in video game development
Machine Learning Is Changing iGaming Software Development
Exclusive Machine Learning News
media monitoring
Signals In The Noise: Using Media Monitoring To Manage Negative Publicity
Analytics Exclusive Infographic
data=driven approach
Turning Dead Zones Into Data-Driven Opportunities In Retail Spaces
Big Data Exclusive Infographic

Stay Connected

1.2KFollowersLike
33.7KFollowersFollow
222FollowersPin

You Might also Like

social data analytics
Social Media Analytics

4 Amazing Time Saving Analytics Tools For Social Media Marketing

9 Min Read

20 Top Twitter Monitoring and Analytics Tools

11 Min Read
using big data for social media marketing
Big DataExclusiveMarketingSocial Data

How Businesses Are Using Big Data For Social Media Marketing?

11 Min Read

Hugo Chavez should optimize Twitter

5 Min Read

SmartData Collective is one of the largest & trusted community covering technical content about Big Data, BI, Cloud, Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, IoT & more.

giveaway chatbots
How To Get An Award Winning Giveaway Bot
Big Data Chatbots Exclusive
AI and chatbots
Chatbots and SEO: How Can Chatbots Improve Your SEO Ranking?
Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Exclusive

Quick Link

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Follow US
© 2008-25 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?